Semiconductor-based Marx generators, Si IGBT or SiC MOSFET switching and transformerless topology. For engineers and researchers who want to understand how the equipment works.
The Marx generator, originally proposed by Erwin Marx in 1924, charges n capacitors in parallel from a relatively low-voltage DC power supply, Udc, and then connects them in series with a load, without a pulse transformer. EPS Marx generators use controllable semiconductors to achive flexible, repetitive, precise pulse waveforms.
The voltage output is given by:
Considering enough energy stored in the Marx n capacitors, the output voltage is weakly dependent on load impedance — a key advantage over transformer-based pulsers, which suffer significant droop when load conductivity varies (as it does in food products, where the electric conductivity can shift ±30% during a PEF pass).
Why Si IGBTs or SiC MOSFETs? For industrial food processing applications, Silicon (Si) IGBTs provide a rugged, cost-effective solution characterized by excellent resistance to overcurrent spikes, high short-circuit withstand capabilities, and superior conduction efficiency under heavy, continuous loads. Their slower switching speeds minimize electromagnetic interference (EMI), protecting nearby automated packaging lines and factory sensors from electrical noise disruptions. Conversely, high-performance medical devices and particle accelerators rely on Silicon Carbide (SiC) MOSFETs to achieve ultra-fast nanosecond switching times, pulse edge definition, and high repetition frequencies. These high-speed capabilities eliminate tail currents, allowing medical equipment to deliver highly repeatable, precision energy bursts. Furthermore, SiC’s exceptional thermal conductivity dramatically shrinks the footprint of cooling structures, enabling more compact, efficient, and reliable electronics..
The EPULSUS-FBML1-5 implements a multilevel Marx architecture in which intermediate voltage levels are accessible by switching partial subsets of the stage capacitors into the discharge path. This produces staircase waveforms with n+1 distinct voltage levels from n stages. The biological significance is that the same generator can deliver a rectangular pulse, a ramped leading edge, a biphasic burst with asymmetric amplitudes, or a decaying envelope — without hardware modification. Rise time at each step is still limited only by the LC time constant of the switching loop.
Applying an electric field to a cell destabilizes its lipid bilayer, reducing the energy barrier required for water molecules to bridge the hydrophobic core. This temporarily creates transient, hydrophilic pores (electroporation), allowing molecules to cross the membrane — either substances entering the cell (e.g. DNA or drugs) or intracellular compounds being extracted (e.g. polyphenols, pigments, oils) — or causing cell death if the process is irreversible. Pulsed Electric Fields (PEF) reduce thermal load in the process. Generator parameters enable tuning the PEF effects.
The cell membrane is an electrical capacitor: a lipid bilayer ~5 nm thick with a dielectric constant ε ≈ 2, surrounded by conductive cytoplasm and extracellular medium. At rest, the natural transmembrane potential (TMP) is approximately −70 mV. When an external electric field E is applied, the induced TMP across a spherical cell of radius r is described by the Schwan equation:
For a typical mammalian cell (r ≈ 10 μm), τ is of order 100–500 ns. This charging time constant is critical: it defines the regime in which the pulse operates.
The plasma membrane fully charges. TMP builds up to 1.5·E·r at the poles. Above a critical threshold (~0.2–1 V), hydrophilic pores nucleate in the lipid bilayer. Reversible if the dose is controlled; irreversible (IRE) above a lethal threshold.
The plasma membrane cannot fully charge. The field penetrates into the cytoplasm and drives TMP across intracellular membranes (ER, mitochondria, nuclear envelope). This is supra-electroporation — simultaneous nanoporation of all membranes at much higher field strengths (10–300 kV/cm).
Every electroporation protocol occupies a point in the two-dimensional space defined by electric field strength E and pulse duration τ. The accessible biological effects are strongly determined by this location:
The dashed vertical line marks the approximate membrane charging time constant τcell. To the right: classical electroporation of the plasma membrane. To the left: nsPEF, where intracellular targets dominate. Each EPULSUS generator is shown by its pulse-duration range (horizontal extent) and the field strengths typically accessed in practice (vertical extent depends on chamber gap and electrode geometry).
When pulse duration falls below τcell, the plasma membrane acts as a high-pass filter — the field propagates through it and charges intracellular membranes directly. The result is supra-electroporation: the simultaneous formation of large numbers of nanopores (<1 nm) in every membrane compartment, at field strengths of 10–300 kV/cm.
The biological cascade is distinct from classical electroporation: calcium release from the ER, collapse of the mitochondrial membrane potential ΔΨm, caspase activation and programmed apoptosis — without the necrotic, inflammatory response associated with thermal methods. At sub-lethal doses, nsPEF modulates intracellular signalling without membrane disruption. The FBML1-5, with sub-50 ns rise times, accesses this regime.
The difference between applying unipolar or bipolar pulses to cells is not just polarity — it is the mechanism by which charge is managed between pulses, which determines electrode longevity, electrolysis mitigation, and the stress imposed to the cell membrane.

The n capacitors Ci are charged in parallel from DC supply Udc via switches Tci and diodes Dci. On triggering, switches Tdi reconfigure the capacitors into a series string, producing a positive rectangular pulse v0 ≈ n · Udc into the load (treatment chamber).
The discharge of the capacitors is controlled by the switching interval. Output pulse flatness depends on the ratio of discharge time constant (RL·Ctotal/n) to the programmed pulse width — for EPULSUS industrial generators, droop is typically <5% over the pulse.
Each unipolar pulse deposits net charge into the load. In electrode-contact systems this drives electrolytic reactions at the electrode surface (oxidation/reduction, pH gradients, electrode erosion). For applications where this is acceptable — certain batch chamber configurations — unipolar operation is the simplest implementation.

n+1 Capacitors Ci charged via Tfi, Tei, Dhi, Dgi. Positive mode: switches Tfi and Tai conduct — first n capacitors in series apply a positive pulse. Negative mode: switches Tbi and Tei conduct — last n capacitors in series apply a negative pulse. Each half-cycle is independently timed, enabling asymmetric bipolar waveforms with different positive and negative amplitudes, widths and inter-pulse delays.
Why bipolar matters biologically: a biphasic pulse delivers zero net charge to the load over each complete cycle, eliminating electrolytic reactions at electrode surfaces and preventing the build-up of ion concentration gradients that would otherwise distort the local electric field between pulses. In electroporation, the reversal also cancels membrane charge accumulation, allowing higher repetition rates without the progressive hyperpolarisation that can artificially inhibit re-poration in subsequent pulses.
In plasma applications voltage waveforms that alternate rapidly between positive and negative—are highly utilized in plasma applications. By preventing charge accumulation on dielectric surfaces, they improve discharge stability, increase electron density, and suppress arc formation. .
Selected publications by Prof. Luís Redondo and co-authors. 100+ papers in international peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings. 2,100+ citations · h-index 24 (Google Scholar, 2025).
PhD · Coordinator Professor, ISEL-IPL · Senior Member, IEEE
Luís Redondo received his B.Sc. and Dipl.Ing. in Electrical Engineering from ISEL-IPL (1990, 1992), his M.Sc. in Nuclear Physics from FCUL-UL (1996), and his Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering — Pulsed Power Electronics — from IST-UTL in 2004. He is currently Coordinator Professor at the Lisbon School of Engineering (ISEL), where he teaches Power Electronics and Pulsed Power and supervises the Electrical Engineering master's degree programme.
His research focuses exclusively on solid-state pulsed power technology and industrial applications. He founded EnergyPulse Systems in 2011 and the Association for the Advancement of Pulsed Power (A2P2) in 2015, where he serves as Vice-President. He chaired the EAPPC-BEAMS-MEGAGAUSS conference in Estoril (2016) and the Bioelectrics Symposium in Lisbon (September 2023).
Since September 2024, Luís Redondo is Senior Editor for Industrial, Commercial, and Biological Applications of Plasmas of the IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science (TPS), the field's primary journal. He has been Publications Chair of the IEEE Pulsed Power Conference since 2013, and is a member of the Euro-Asian Pulsed Power Conference (EAPPC) and High-Power Particle Beams (BEAMS) International Committees.
The paper "Review on Solid-State-Based Marx Generators" (Zhong, Rao, Liu & Redondo, IEEE TPS 2021) received the IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science Best Paper Award for 2024, announced in the March 2025 issue of TPS. The award is granted by the NPSS Publications Committee and recognises the most impactful paper published in TPS in the preceding years.
A curated library of peer-reviewed publications on PEF technology — wine, olive oil, dairy, bioelectrics, IRE and pulsed power engineering. Papers by EPS researchers and key independent studies.
Browse Research Library →